Movie Reviews

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix

  • Title: Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
  • IMDB: link

Harry Potter finally gets a little style. Harry Potter’s 5th installment of the film is well balanced in acting, technique, mood and storyline, and is a complete joy to watch. I found myself more enthralled in the characters and their relationships with one another instead of being completely bashed with one special effect after another like the 4th film. The Order of the Phoenix kept a great balance with their computer-antics and maturity of characters. Harry has his first kiss, Ron is no longer the complete blubbering idiot, Hermione isn’t so girly and winy and plenty of screen time for characters that had such small parts in the past. Getting a few extra storylines from other characters like Sirius Black, Fred & George Weasley, Neville, Luna and Cho makes the film feel more complete and a whole than just focusing on Potter’s little group. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the best of the 5 to date.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix Read More »

License to SUCK

A comedy shouldn’t feel like such a drain on one’s emotions teetering on a really bad marriage and a slow trip through Dante’s 7 Levels of Hell. Williams doing his best with what little provided in such a bland and simply redundant script, and Mandy Moore with her counterpart, John Krasinski, playing the typical guy meets girl, guy screws up, girl forgives guy roles, yayayayaya.. I felt a bit psychic…I just knew what was coming up next. The forced feeling of a very minimal amount of stand-upish comedy mixed with an everyday, seen it before, romantic comedy, License to Wed is more like license to head straight for the dollar shelf at your local video store. You guessed it; the film was just that good.

License To Wed
1/2 Star

“Say something positive, come on there has to be something of value in that almost 2 hours wasted on such a piece of Hollywood fluff”, the words keep repeating through my head. Okay, here is something positive, Robin Williams had a couple of comedic moments that gathered a chuckle from me, but for the most part it all fell pretty flat, flat on it’s face that is. License to Wed is a disaster, impossible to correct, but general candy laden minds will love it. Girls will think it’s cute and sweet with a syrupy happy ending and guys will laugh at the irrelevant jokes spewing from Reverend Frank’s and his young protégé’s mouths.

I Want A Divorce!

It’s true love in less than 6 months, Ben Murphy (John Krasinski) a boyish handsome klutz, falls for the sweetest girl ever, Sadie Jones (Mandy Moore), their relationship streaming through a voice over to the moment of her parents wedding anniversary and Ben’s proposal. Followed up by an insistence of marrying at the family church, St. Augustine, by Reverend Frank (Robin Williams) the couple must endure the crazy reverend’s marriage-prep course. Leading to all types of problems, no sex till the wedding date, weird little bouts of his role playing, uncomfortable moments of honesty when sex is brought up and feelings about Sadie’s family. Reverend Frank tests the young couple to the very end of their wits, when they can’t think why they should get married; she heads off on their honeymoon, leaving him sulking in his beer. No matter how hard Ben had tried to prove the reverend crazy and unfit to play the role, he ended up the fool in the end, or did he? When it was all said and done, the whole crew ended up in the Caribbean as Reverend Frank, on the beach under the warm ocean sun, wed the young couple.

Awe what a happy ending, the damn thing couldn’t have come soon enough. I wiggled and maneuvered all over my chair, as if some weird plague of fire ants where breathing down my pants, I was so bored and dire need to find the whole thing to be just a short nightmare, but no such luck License to Wed kept drooling on and on until the final last note was played out. I was so elated that I jumped for joy overpowering some old lady and tumbling her, walker and all, down the theater steps, that was more humorous than the whole evening sitting in the dark as the drones surrounding laughed at such in-humorous jabs.

License to SUCK Read More »

Less, Far Less, Than Meets the Eye

  • Title: Transformers
  • IMDb: link

As a kid I had Transformers toys, I watched the television series without fail, and collected the original Marvel Comics Transformers series (all 80 issues and those lame cross-over mini-series too!).  So the fanboy in me was ecstatic when I learned that a live-action film of the comics, television show, and toys I grew up with was going to be attempted.  But when I heard that Michael Bay was going to head the project I felt less than thrilled.  Remember, this is from the guy who defended The Island, but I still doubted whether Bay could translate the stories of my youth to the big screen.  I shouldn’t have worried because he didn’t even try.  There isn’t a single recognizable moment from the Transformers of my childhood other than you’ve got robots that transform into objects and vehicles.  I am deeply saddened that Bay and his writers didn’t trust the source material and the original character designs and mythology choosing instead to throw out over twenty-years of history to do it their own way.  The result is less, far less, than meets the eye.

Less, Far Less, Than Meets the Eye Read More »

I Want to Murder Michael Bay

It’s really amazing.  Take one of the coolest ideas for an event summer tent-pole picture ever, get Steven Spielberg to produce, pull off every visual aspect of the film and throw in some pretty decent actors.  All of this in one movie.  And even though a lot of it rocks your hard, the big picture still doesn’t work.  All because of one man.

Transformers
Custom Rating

I’m young, so maybe I was too idealistic and hopeful about the impending Transformers movie before it came out.  But come on dude, what red-blooded American male isn’t turned on by the prospect of watching alien robots fight each other for two hours, while occasionally changing their visages to match those of some awesome cars?  In the end, I don’t think my dreams for the film could be were totally unfounded – in fact, I’d say that most of the things I was hoping the film would deliver wound up in the final product.  It’s just that, through all of my excitement for my film, I forgot about one inevitable factor; a factor that became the primary catalyst of the movie and changed this film from being maybe one of the best summer films I’ve ever seen into a jumbled mess of an other-wise far-out action movie.  That catalyst’s name is Michael Bay

Here’s the story: there is no story.  I mean, there is some vague hinting towards an overall plot linking all of the scenes together, but to call that a ‘story’ might be a bit of a stretch.  Whatever story there is here, there’s enough of it to tell the audience that there are creatures [henceforth referred to as “Transformers” or “Fucking Awesome Mofos”] that turn into cars that have come to Earth to find “The Cube,” a device that creates worlds.  Some of these Transformers are trying to destroy the cube before some of these evil ones put it to bad use.  Shia LaBouf, Tyrese, Josh Duhamel, John Turturro, Jon Voight and some new actress who is so hot that it almost hurts are all somehow involved by the end.  That’s about all I could discern from the film.

Most of the time when you refer to a film as having almost no story, it’s a pretty damning statement to make.  This is hardly Transformers’ case, as its lack of plot is validated because the movie is too busy kicking you ass to have any time for “plot development.”  The movie is a full-on embodiment of everything a summer sceptical movie should be – from the high-octane excitement that few action films can achieve, to the aforementioned girl who’s so hot that it almost hurts – very few movies are this apt for a Fourth of July weekend release.

Josh Duhamel, trying to understand
why anyone would ever hire Michael Bay.

Mostly, the presence of a story is unnecessary because of the nice collection of actors we have here.  Some of them are flat, but a majority (LaBouf, Turturro, Voight, among others) are able to insert enough pep into their often cheesy dialogue to strike just the right chord.  There isn’t a speck of character development throughout the entire film, but the actors are having enough fun on screen that it’s all good for the audience.  The film is also greatly helped by the CGI effects, and they’re some of the best to present themselves on the big-screen to date.  The dirtied by oil, but still full of new-car gleam Transformers are totally boss, hardcore and a half to say the least.  We’ve also got some great photography here, from first-time DP Mitchell Amundsen.  He really knows how to utilise the chrome on the cars, and saturates the whole film in rich colors and bright sunsets.  In some movies it might be too much, but it’s just right for this kind of Blockbuster.

It’s all going great.  Really, just wonderful.  But a few minutes into the movie, you slowly realize that, despite a million strengths, this is still a Michael Bay movie.  Typical of our man Mike, his movies are still edited to be way too fast, with shots rarely lasting any longer than five seconds.  He cuts every shot to tight, never giving the audience or the actors any time to breath and enjoy the ride.  You hardly ever get a chance in the movie’s two and a half hours to appreciate the fun acting or the fantastic effects.  You really feel like you have to put forth an effort to follow the film, something a movie that’s based off of an 80s toy-line should never be.

Fans of Bay’s film-making style might argue that this quickly-paced film just isn’t my kind of film and that his films work for a majority of people; but they would be stupid.  Not just because they’re Michael Bay fans, but because this style of utilitarian, thrifty editing has worked with great ease in movies like The Bourne Supremacy.  Maybe it’s unfair to compare Bay to a great director like Supremacy‘s Paul Greengrass, but the point is that Bay can’t even pull off his own brand of film-making.

Bay, plain and simple, just doesn’t know how to assemble a film.  He may be great for holding together giant films with budgets that have nine digits worth of dollars, but he doesn’t have any business directing.  He would probably make for a fantastic producer, but come on Hollywood, give us a break by giving one to Bay.

I like the on-line ads for Transformers a lot.  Out of the hands of Bay’s explosion of editing and speed, they’re just stand alone close-ups of Megatron and company, with a gorgeous twilighted city behind them.  I actually get to spend a few seconds taking in the production value in these ads, I just wish I had the opportunity to do so during the film it was created for.

I Want to Murder Michael Bay Read More »

‘Rat’ Packs Light, Easy Film

Ratatouille might be the most disappointing film of the summer – when you can find the names of Pixar and Brad Bird in a film’s credits, you’re usually in a position to expect great things.  Though this rat can’t live up to those names like this writer was hoping, it’s still is Pixar and it still is Brad Bird, and that by itself should be enough to make the film enjoyable, if nothing else.

Ratatouille
3 & 1/2 Stars

There’s no greater dynasty in Hollywood today than Pixar.  Since day one, they’ve been putting out good product that grosses well into nine digits, and despite the scores of other computer animated films trying to copy the studio’s ironclad formula, no one even comes close to making it work.  It’s because of this that, even when the studio puts out as fine as a film as Ratatouille, it’s still a let-down that leaves you thinking there should have been more.

Remy is a rat that wants to cook; so when he meets a no-talent chef in need of some help, it’s a match made in heaven.  Unsurprisingly, there are a few hurdles to get through before everyone’s all-smiles, but it’s a family movie where everyone is happy (except the bad guy, who totally deserved it anyway.)  Easy as pie, without ever getting too complicated.  But the dudes at Pixar know how to tell a story – from fresh and full character designs, delicate humor that’s hilarious without being offensive and enough detail and ambiance poured in the streets of Paris to fill a library, seeing a Pixar film has always been more of an experience than just about all of Hollywood’s output, and Ratatouille is no exception.

So what’s wrong with the film?  There are plenty fine ingredients that come together wonderfully in the movie, it’s just that nothing really sticks out.  The visuals and the humor are never enough to push this only decent and sometimes lackluster script through to the level of creating the great film that I’ve come to hope for out of Pixar.  Really, there doesn’t seem to be a thing wrong with the film in the slightest, but it’s only good, not great.

The Pixar machine, after a spotless streak, is starting to slow.  They followed Finding Nemo and The Incredibles with the half-there, half-not effort of Cars, and now there’s Ratatouille to add to the mix.  But what’s worth mentioning is that the guys are still at the absolute peak of computer animation in a world where it’s the flavor of the week.  As disappointing as Ratatouille may be for me, imagine what it would be like if it were produced by the guys behind the Shrek franchise – it’d probably just be another parade of fart jokes that the theater would unreasonably expect you to pay $10 for.  Pixar might not be the invincible studio it was not even five years ago, but it’s still bounds ahead of anyone else.

Ratatouille is damn charming.  I can’t say that it lives up to some of Pixar’s other films; but with a line of work so long and so successful, the studio is sure to be the next Disney of animation – Ratatouille just won’t be a highlight.

‘Rat’ Packs Light, Easy Film Read More »