3 Razors

Man of the Year

  • Title: Man of the Year
  • IMDB: link

Man of the YearWe’ve seen this done before, and done better.  Man of the Year doesn’t come close to Levinson’s direction of David Mamet’s wickedly humorous satire Wag the Dog and lacks the warmth of Dave.  It falls apart in the second act, seemingly written and directed by a studio exec’s retarded grandson, as the film losses all it’s momentum as the comedy is shelved for a thrill-less thriller.

Tom Dobbs (Robin Williams) is a comedian with his own late-night political show, think Bill Maher or Jon Stewart amped up on caffeine.  An offhand remark by a audience member begins a series of unusual and unbelievable circumstances leading this funny man to become the President of the United States.

It has a perfect set-up.  As Dobbs runs just to stir the pot, which no one takes seriously, Elanor Green (Laura Linney), an employee of the Diebold-like maker of the new voting machines, discovers a slight flaw in the system.  When she presents her findings to the CEO she is told the problem is being worked on and will be corrected.

Man of the Year Read More »

School for Scoundrels

  • Title: School for Scoundrels
  • IMDb: link

School for ScoundrelsRoger (Jon Heder) is a loser.  By day he is abused by fellow workers and law breakers in his job as a meter-maid.  By night Roger pines for his neighbor, a sweet girl named Amanda (Jacinda Barrett) whose roommate (Sarah Silverman) is as sarcastic as Amanda is nice.

Unable to express his feelings to the woman he loves Roger decides to join a secret confidence building course run by the unscrupulous Dr. P (Billy Bob Thornton).  There he meets other losers like himself (Todd Louiso, Horatio Sanz, Matt Walsh, Jon Glaser, Leonard Earl Howse) and for the first time begins to feel a part of something.

Roger’s success in the class has some dire consequences.  Dr. P decides to challenge Roger and make a move on Amanda, using every dirty trick imaginable.  Roger is forced to either tell the truth or beat his professor at his own game.

The film is full of gags and some increasingly brutal humor.  It doesn’t have the balls to go for the big laughs Thornton got in Bad Santa, but it is consistently funny throughout.

The supporting cast, stolen mostly from former SNL casts, does well.  Silverman plays her typical bitch on wheels and is a little too shrill for me here.  If she’s serious about giving acting a chance I’d like to see her branch out a little more.  There are two cameo roles that stand out, Ben Stiller and David Cross, who are so good you wonder why the script couldn’t fit them into the plot more.

It’s a fine comedy that won’t bore you.  It doesn’t have the huge belly laughs you would expect from this material, but it is consistantly funny throughout.  If guy humor, men getting shot in the crotch with paint guns, and losers trying pitifully to impress women sound like your thing, you should enjoy yourself.  It’s well worth the price of admission.

School for Scoundrels Read More »

Give Peace A Chance

  • Title: The U.S. vs. John Lennon
  • IMDb: link

The U.S. vs. John LennonThe year of the documentary continues.  The U.S. vs. John Lennon takes its place along a great list of documentaries released this year that include An Inconvenient Truth (read that review here), Who Killed the Electric Car? (read that review here), Cocaine Cowboys (that review is coming, I promise), and Wordplay (read that review here).  Aside from being informative and entertaining the documentary is quite timely; I urge everyone to watch closely at the speeches Richard Nixon gives about the Vietnam War and compare them, as the film does in a very small part, to our current administration’s conflict in Iraq.

John Lennon was a God in the late 1960’s and 1970’s.  He was also an intellectual, and in a way that would make Toby Keith go into fits of rage, a strong antiwar activist.  The documentary begins with a summing up of the political and cultural landscape of the time.  It discusses the Nixon White House, the Black Panthers, political activists Bobby Seale, Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and others.

From there the film jumps to Lennon’s height of popularity with The Beatles, his meeting with Yoko Ono, and how he evolved from the lead singer and spokesman of a British band into one of the world’s most outspoken anti-war activists.

The film follows Lennon’s attempts atpeaceful activism including his “Hair Peace, Bed Peace” sit-ins and his famous “Bed-Ins” in Amsterdam and Montreal, the recording of the album “Give Peace a Chance” which would become the international anthem for the peace movement, and the even more eccentric “Bagism” where Lennon and Ono were interviewed by reporters while completely covered under a bag.

Despite the couple’s list of eccentricities and oddities, Lennon was so popular and so out-spoken against the Vietnam War that Richard Nixon’s White House began a campaign to deport him.  The documentary follows those years of Lennon fighting the system and trying to stay in his adopted home of New York City, as Senator Strom Thurmond and INS worked just as hard to kick Lennon out of the country.

The film is fascinating watching interviews with those who knew Lennon inter-mixed with clips and music from the time period.  My sole complaint with the film is it’s a little slow getting started.  The first half-hour or so tries to paint the picture of the period and events before it ever gets to Lennon specifically.  While great for youngsters, many people will find this remedial history a tad boring.

However, once the film shifts focus to Lennon and his battles against the Nixon White House things get good, really good.  Lennon and his legacy are in good hands here, and we are given some timely and balls-on perfect commentary by Gore Vidal about Nixon’s White House and the Bush White House today.  I’m sure it will be enough to send Toby Keith into fits of rage, which is of course always a good thing.

John Lennon was an idealist, he was a little crazy, and he was right.  We need people like him today.  The documentary shows how this country needs people like Lennon to open their eyes to troubles we are all too willing to ignore.  Unlike today’s celebrities who pick up and leave causes at the drop of a hat, without ever really understanding them, Lennon understood, and felt deeply personal over, the issues of his day and saw a need and responsibility to share those views with the word.  He is missed, today more than ever.

Give Peace A Chance Read More »

Knights of the Sky

  • Title: Flyboys
  • IMDb: link

Flyboys main problem is it’s just too Hollywood.  It’s too nice, it’s too stylish, and it’s just too damn clean.  Despite being based on a real story the film feels Hollywood fake, which is a problem.  Still the actors do what they can with the script and find a way to make a good, if not particularly memorable, film.

WWI is raging across Europe and America stands idly by.  A group of young Americans, of different backgrounds, from different states, and for different reasons, travel to France to join the fight.  They volunteer for the Lafayette Escadrille, an elite fighter pilot division, to take on the German air force.

The characters in the film are your standard army film group.  There’s the best of the group Blaine Rawlings (James Franco) who is burdened with a conscience and falls for a local woman (Jennifer Decker).  There’s the black fighter (Abdul Salis) who doesn’t want to fight, the screw-up who can’t shoot straight (David Ellison), the one who succumbs to the pressure (Philip Winchester), and the spoiled rich kid (Tyler Labine).  It wouldn’t be a war film with a noble captain (Jean Reno) and a mysterious and aloof flight instructor (Martin Henderson).

The film begins with how each came to volunteer, follows their training and early missions, and their final mission of glory.

The acting is as good as it can be given these stock characters and relationships.  The real stars of the film are the dogfights.  At the beginning they are a little to much like a video game for me, but they improve over the course of the film as the squad becomes part of the fighting unit.

There are problems of course.  The story is far from original and relies too much on the aerial dogfights and likeability of its cast.  It’s also is a little too brash for my taste; it has all the subtlety of a Michael Bay film.

I would have preferred a film that had paid a little more attention to detail rather than try to look as lush and clean as this one.  Everything is just too Hollywood beautiful.  And what a rich country France must have been during the war, to have every single member of their country dressed in new clothing, perfectly washed and pressed daily (even as they evacuate cities).  And who knew that French military uniforms are so resistant to dirt and wear they always look like they were just sewn.  Amazing.

Despite the films flaws, gross generalizations, and lack of accuracy in small matters, it still is an enjoyable film, and one of the few war movies acceptable for young teenagers.  It’s nowhere near as bad as Pearl Harbor, but is inflicted with some of the same flaws.  Still, for what it does right it is easy enough to recommend.

Knights of the Sky Read More »

That’s All?

  • Title: All the King’s Men
  • IMDb: link

All the King's MenIn 1950 All the King’s Men won Best Actor (Broderick Crawford), Best Supporting Actress (Mercedes McCambridge), and Best Picture.  I wish that was the film we were about to discuss, but sadly it is not.  In 2006 Hollywood decided to make an inferior remake.  Sadly, this is the film we will discuss.

Willie Stark (Sean Penn) is chosen by mobster Tiny Duffy (James Gandolfini) to enter the race for Louisiana Governor.  Tiny sees Stark as the wide-eyed innocent do-gooder who will split the vote and keep his man in office.  Once Stark learns of this situation he plunges head on into the campaign and becomes the Governor of Louisiana.

While this is happening, young newspaper man Jack Burden (Jude Law) is covering the story for his paper, and begins to believe that Willie Stark might just be the right man for the job.  Burden sees a fellow dreamer in Willie and thinks, just maybe, Stark might do some good.

Once in office Stark takes on the oil companies and state legislature, tyring to make good his campaign promises of spreading the wealth and creating new jobs, new schools, new roads and bridges, for the less fortunate of the state.  The power brokers however see this man as a menace and fight to hold onto their wealth.

Oddly enough the movie doesn’t have a main character.  The first half of the movie centers mostly around Stark, at times leaving his story to focus on Burden.  In the film’s second half the focus shifts 180, as Stark’s story is moved to the back-burner in favor of Burden’s tale.

There are countess stories that branch off of Burden’s tale which involve his childhood best friend (Mark Ruffalo), who Willie wants to use for publicity, his childhood crush (Kate Winslet), who has her own secrets, his disapproving mother (Kathy Baker), his relationship with Stark and his staff including Stark’s gal Friday (Patricia Clarkson), his relationship with the influential man who helped raise him (Anthony Hopkins), who Stark wants Burden to bring down, and more.

The film feels very much like a large novel shoved into the small frames of a movie reel.  There’s just too much there, and it’s so badly managed that you never really learn about the situations or characters.  Was Willie Stark a good Samaritan that wanted to help out the unfortunate, or was he a crook and thief milking the state for money?  The movie never decides, and, what’s worse, never even presents evidence either way.  All we get is third-hand gossip.

The structure of the film leaves much to be desired.  It opens in an odd flashback sequence that is troubling, and Willie’s initial forray into politic is less than adequately explained (and Tiny’s as a choice for Lt. Governor is never explained).  In too many places the film feels like an unfinished rough-cut instead of a movie being pushed into the Oscar race.

The two men’s stories don’t really have much to do with each other, and the film would have been better served to put one or the other front and center instead of wobbling between the two.  Nor do the flashbacks from Burden’s past, shown over and over again, add to any part of the film.  It’s just a slow plodding exercise that seems to be there to give everyone a chance to act.

Speaking of the acting, it’s darn good.  The film survives based on the performances of these actors – and considering Penn looks like he’s wearing a groundhog on his head for most of the film that’s something to be proud of.

The level of talent here sets expectations and demands certainly more than competence.  Sadly that’s all we get.  The film really, really wants to be an Oscar contender, but there isn’t a single performance, shot, line of dialogue, or piece of score, that is memorable, let alone remarkable.  This film feels very much like a remake and a film based off a novel, but without the author’s perspective.  We get characters, we get stories, but we don’t get a point.  With the cast involved and a director like Steven Zaillian behind the camera I expected more than an underwhelming, two-hour, instantly forgettable film.

That’s All? Read More »