July 2006

A Jay and Silent Bob Movie?

  • Title: Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back
  • IMDb: link

“A Jay and Silent Bob movie; who would pay to see that?”
 

Jay and Silent Bob Strike BackAfter discovering that a movie is being made from the comic book based off their misadventures, Jay (Jason Mewes) and Silent Bob (Kevin Smith) travel cross country to stop the film from being made.  Along the way they meet a hitchhiker (George Carlin), a nun (Carrie Fisher), and a lesbian gang of thieves (Shannon Elizabeth, Ali Larter, Eliza Dushku, Jennifer Schwalbach).  The girls steal diamonds using the clueless duo of stoners for dupes.

With an orangutan they stole from an animal testing center, Jay and Silent Bob try to make their way to Hollywood staying one-step in front of Federal Wildlife Marshal Willenholly (Will Ferrell) and a host of policemen (including an almost unrecognizable Judd Nelson) who are hot on their trail.

The film brings back several character from the previous View Askew films.  From Clerks we get the Quick Stop along with Dante (Brian O’Halloran) and Randal (Jeff Anderson).  From Mallrats we get Brodie (Jason Lee) who now owns his own comic book shop (the shop used for the film is Kevin Smith’s own place in Redbank, NJ – Jay and Silent Bob’s Secret Stash).  From Chasing Amy we get Holen (Ben Affleck), Spanky (Jason Lee), Alyssa (Joey Lauren Adams), and Hooper (Dwight Ewell).

A Jay and Silent Bob Movie? Read More »

Clerks II: The Interview

A couple of weeks back, Ian and myself took part in a roundtable interview with Brian O’Halloran (Dante) and Jeff Anderson (Randal) of Kevin Smith’s latest flick, Clerks II.  Hilarity and insight ensued.

Clerks II
N/A

Roundtable interviews consist of a gaggle of critics and press types throwing questions at often very weary actors and crew promoting their films.  Brian and Jeff were more than up to the task, as you’ll see below.  Questions are in bold, and their answers in plain faced type.  Enjoy.

Why did it take 10 years to come up with a sequel?

Jeff: They had to negotiate my contract.

  Brian: I don’t know. It’s the not the type of film that sequels….That screamed to be made.  It was the type of film that you could do 2 or 3 or even 5 years later. You had to give it some time for the characters to grow. You know he had some other stories to tell, he did sprinkle the characters in his other films from time to time. I can project, ya know? (As everyone is situating their microphones)

Jeff: He’s a theater man!

Brian: I think it was something that uh, it was time.

Are any of the bits (in the film) true to life?

Jeff: Donkey show, oh yeah.

Brian: Well, I did food service for a couple of years back in high school.

Did you have good customer relations?

Brian: Uh, yah and no. I would say things like ‘Fuck you very much’ as they
  walked out the door. They already had their food, so they’d say ‘Did he say
  fuck you?’

You mentioned the Donkey Show. Let’s talk about the Donkey Show.

Brian: He (Jeff) mentioned it, not me!

What was your reaction when you first read the script or even on
  the set when they brought in the donkey?

Jeff: Well, they were two entirely different reactions. My first reaction was you know, “I can’t wait to see this!”. You know on the set it was you know, the funnier day, but for different reasons. We shot at this abandoned Burger King that we turned into Moobies. We painted it pink and yellow and orange.  People couldn’t miss it on the street, let’s put it that way. But we filmed on kind of a busy street, so the police would, if we were filming on the street, close up the street, but if we were filming interior stuff the police would open up the street and let cars come by.

For the last few days we had the pen out in the parking lot with the donkey
  in there, and I always just enjoyed it when cars would drive by as we carried
  the leather clad donkey into a fast food establishment. Lots of car accidents,
  so that made it kind of funny.

How long did it take to shoot all the donkey stuff?

Jeff: It was pretty fast. I think we did it in 2 nights work. Lot of cleaning
  up in between. The Donkey liked to mark his territory.

If you had someone like Randall who was pissing in your drink, would
  you, I know you wouldn’t drink it, but would you report him to his manager,
  or would you let him do his thing?

Jeff: I’d just keep right on drinking it and let him do his thing. No, I think
  I’d choose option C and kick his ass. No, I don’t know. I don’t have experience
  with that. I think that’s a situation you have to be in, or not.

A question that actually that I’ve always wondered, and my girlfriend’d
  never seen Clerks; we watched it the other night.. With the exception of a
  couple other smaller projects all you guys have really done is Kevin Smith
  stuff. And both of you, she said ‘What else have those guys done, they’re great?”
  I had all the Kevin Smith stuff and Now You Know the film you (Jeff Anderson)
  did, is there a reason that you guys stuck close to home and did the smaller
  stuff.

Brian: I came from a theater background and, I stuck…I like doing theater a lot, and I’ve done other independent films since. It’s just that I like working with new, smaller type projects. I’ve been out to LA from time to time, once or twice a year. And when the first Clerks came out the film didn’t really catch on immediately…but I’m getting regular work all the time.

What do you want to aspire to? Is there any type of movie or project
you’d like to do either together or separately?

Jeff: I’ll go back and [answer the previous] so that there’s no lingering ‘I can’t act’ or anything. I haven’t been in anything else. The thing I’m concentrating on is writing. I had done the voiceover work, but I’ve stopped doing that now.  That’s what I want to concentrate on; just writing. I wrote and directed ‘Now You Know’, which the Weinstien Company is going to put out right next to Clerks II straight to DVD, but I just wrote another script that I hope to just direct.

Brian: I hope to start a production company, and to direct and produce. I’ve
  produced and directed in theater, so I’d like to move on.

With your theater experience, was that much of a leap? Because it’s
  a different style of acting, you know? Emoting from the stage and emoting in
  10 second bursts?

Brian: It’s a matter of bringing it down, actually. It’s always the best foundation
  for any actor, I always say – doing live on stage because there’s not ‘cut,
  stop, wait, can we do it again?’ You gotta, you’re in front a live audience.
  There’s no stopping, and interacting is always a great thing for knowing –
  the immediate gratification of knowing ‘oh, you’re doing something right’ or
  you’re not. And you have the ability to change it up, and in film it’s up to
  the director to pick out the best cut or the best takes. And you’re like ‘oh,
  god I wish he’d have taken the other one’, but he has different reasons for
  why he would have taken reactions from a different cut.

Do you wonder after those takes what the audience’s reaction will
  be? I mean you can’t go by – sometimes you can go by how the crew reacts but….

Brian: Right, right. Well that’s where the goal of having a really good director
  is in letting you know how he’s feeling on how you come across. But technology’s
  great; you actually have a digital DV as well as the film, you’re actually
  able to go back and see how a take went. Which we were able to, from time to
  time. But also, Kevin was editing the film as we were shooting so, we had an
  editing suite hooked right into – We took over a Day’s Inn which was right
  next to the movie’s location where we all stayed, and he also had an editing
  suite. And Kevin was editing the film as we were going along, so we always
  had a rough assembly to know what we needed, or what we had rather, and if
  we needing anything we’d go down the next morning and quickly get a pick up
  shot or anything of that nature.

So, to go back to an earlier question – This film has everything
  to do with Clerks and the View Askew universe, and it has this cult following.
  I was wondering how often you guys get recognized?

Brian: If I’m wearing the Van Dyke or doing the goatee thing, I get recognized
  pretty much 3 or 4 times a week. It’s never at the right time. By the police
  when I grab something or a loan officer, or a discount rate on hookers.

Is that helpful in opening up opportunities, with people already thinking
  they kinda know you?  Is it in a friendly way, not in like an intimidating
  or ‘you’re a jackass’ way?

Jeff: Unless it’s me. I very rarely get recognized from the movie. Take off
  the backwards baseball cap and I’m a free man.

Brian: You’re really the Clark Kent.

It sounds like you guys are okay with that.

Jeff: Actually I’m more than okay with that. That was actually part of my not rushing into doingClerks II. I sort of like the way it is. I get very nice letters from time to time. Every now and then I’ll meet someone that, you know, knows about the film and it’s never been a bad thing, never interferes with anything and that was sort of – a little bit making me gun shy about doing II. I’m hoping the hat throws them off again.

You’re kinda lucky in that respect. It’s kind of an actor’s conflict.
  I’ve talked to a lot of actors and they want the fame and the fortune (especially
  the fortune), but sometimes the notoriety and the intrusion into their privacy
  kind of bothers them after a while.

Jeff: It’s not even that. It’s just – look; I just don’t fancy myself an actor,
  and it’s always weird to sit down and have a discussion with somebody about
  whatever, and I feel weird the whole time. If someone asks me to sign something
  I spend like 15 minutes arguing with them. I’m like ‘Why? What are you going
  to do with this? You don’t want this. It doesn’t’ mean anything’. It always
  just becomes awkward.

Is the film going to have an R rating or NC-17?

Jeff: Somehow it slipped through with an R. I think maybe they didn’t stay
  for the end of the movie. As we were shooting it we sort of figured – I mean
  the first Clerks was the first movie given an NC-17 strictly due to language.
  And for that one they hired Alan Dershowitz to go in and fight for it, and
  it was reluctantly given an “R” For this one it was thought for sure that it
  was ‘NC-17’, and it was always talked about on the set that it was going to
  go out NC-17, that Kevin wasn’t going to make changes. So Kevin just handed
  it in to the MPAA, more or less did it to get the press of ‘they got an NC-17’
  and they were going to run with that. Then we got the phone call that it went
  through with R, and we were all perplexed and kinda disappointed.

How much editing was done?

Jeff: There was none. The cut that Kevin handed in the first run, that he
  assumed was going to be NC-17 they didn’t ask for – not one cut.

So the donkey dong goes these days?

Jeff: Apparently. Kevin was like ‘maybe we could have gone further!”

You started out with the first movie, and then you moved to the animated series, and then you came to back to live-action. Could you talk about the changes over that period of time? You had to clean up the characters with the TV show. How was it coming back to the full out characters of Dante and Randall?

Brian: Well, we didn’t come back by choice. We would have loved to have been going on our uh, sixth year of the cartoon. Yeah, that something that was the most fun we ever had was doing the cartoon. Unfortunately the biggest offer was from ABC, but we didn’t know the politics that were going on behind the scenes were pretty much for it to be bought just to be buried. It was cancelled before it even aired, and contractually they were obligated to air at least
  two episodes.

But Kevin, you know, it has such a following, the cartoon alone, that Kevin
  will be doing a feature length, uncensored animated film. It’ll probably go
  straight to DVD, it depends of the reaction. Maybe it’ll get a theatrical release,
  but that’s something down the road. Like 2008, 2009-ish. And then coming back
  to this, we’ve been sprinkled in to other films and other things. We did a
  short for Jay Leno a couple of years back. It’s nice coming back, it’s kinda
  weird. I don’t know how to explain it. We both – [Jeff] lives in L.A. and I’ve
  lived in New Jersey since…and we only get to see each other over the years
  for these Kevin Smith events. And so the chemistry, as people keep telling
  us, that we have is something that we can’t figure out. It just happens.

So coming back, it’s not that hard to do. You know it’s also a testament to
  Kevin’s writing. That he can put together such dialogue that we can ‘bing bing
  bing’ and….

Jeff: Doing the cartoon definitely screwed with the characters a litte bit,
  because when we first went in to do the cartoon I sat down and was like ‘Do
  you want this to be Randall? Cause that’s kinda boring and flat’. Obviously
  for animation you have to kinda take it up a little bit so the voice went up
  a little, the hands gotta go When we did the animated series everything is
  so much bigger and heightened, and you have to change your inflections.

When we did the flying car thing, which was a Jay Leno short, we went in and it was the first time we’d done live action Dante and Randal in a while. When we did the first setup we did me and did all my stuff, and then we were going to do all Brian’s stuff. The first time I did it, I read it as Randal would do it from the movie, because we’re not in cartoonland. Then they switched the camera over to Brian, and when Brian was reading I amped him up to cartoon Randal. The voice went up a little higher, I was throwing the hands up, basically trying to get him to mess up and forget his lines. And as I was doing that I saw Kevin over by the monitor and his eyebrows got like (arched in idea pose) so immediately we stopped and he was like ‘Put the camera back over’, so they put the camera back over and he goes ‘Cartoon Randal’.

So I did it just more with the hands, and being a little more animated than
  the flat Randall from the movie. So for this one we’d go into a scene and I’d
  ask ‘Do you want cartoon?’, and he’d say ‘We’ll see’. And then I’d do it and
  somewhere off behind the monitor you’d hear ‘More cartoon! More cartoon!’ So
  you’d bring it up a little, so it did make the characters a little different.

Brian: Those are the new working terms: “Cartoon Randal! Cartoon Brian!’

Can you tell us anything about the animated movie?

Brian: Nothing that I know of, except that I was at a press thing with Kevin
  recently and he put out the fact that he’s definitely going to do it some time.
  He has several projects before that that he wants to work on. So sometime like
  2008.

Did the unfortunate ABC experience sour you on television?

Brian: No, not at all. You learn not to listen to the politics of television.
  ‘Cause UPN had offered Kevin and the producers a full season. Guaranteed, on
  the air a full season. And with the ratings that UPN was getting at the time,
  we would have been the rating gods. ABC was like, they didn’t want the property
  that Disney owned, because they owned Miramax. You know like, ‘keep it in the
  family’ type of thing. They didn’t want one of their properties to make another
  channel successful.

What’s it like having an action figure of yourselves? Do you have
  one?

Brian: I do! Two things that you’ve brought up are both little successes and things I always wanted to have. Number one: a cartoon of some sort. And number 2 having a Star Wars figure, but this is the next best thing. It’s kinda weird in the sense that it’s like ‘Alright, I’m done’.

Jeff: I didn’t even know about it. My niece called me up and said “Uncle Jeff, you’re an action figure’ and I was like ‘No, no. Your uncle is not G.I. Joe.’  And then when I knew about it – I actually just got one.
I asked Kevin ‘Am I ever getting one?” and he brought me one like 6 months ago. I was like ‘Not a lot of them around, huh?’ And he was like ‘One.’

Why do you think these characters resonate with people? Any thoughts?

Brian: (Long pause) I’m just taken in by the passion of your question. It’s
  kind of weird. It came out at a weird time. If the first one came out any later
  or any sooner I don’t think it would have resonated. It was the end, or the
  beginning, of grunge in a sense where it was that kind of Generation X, I know
  we shouldn’t use that term anymore, but it spoke to those slackers who didn’t
  know where they wanted to go coming out of high school, and the college wasn’t
  their thing. There were a lot of people in their 20s back then, in that time,
  that didn’t know where they wanted to go. They didn’t want to go to college,
  or they tried college and it just wasn’t them. And where do we go? And they
  just had the friendships that they had.

I think that it was also the beginning of independent film at that time, being
  really accepted by the mainstream. You had Pulp Fiction coming out, there was
  El Mariachi. Everyone caught on to this black and white, low budget…you know
  the dialogue was something that you hadn’t heard really in a mainstream movie
  before, or the subject matter, for that matter, was not subjects that were
  tackled by our age group in the movies before. And that were actually funny
  and watchable for any length of time.

It was something that was passed around like ‘you gotta see this movie’ even
  though it never made such a great impact theatrically. It just took off with
  that word of mouth and then its four years later. It’s almost like that college
  band that takes many years like, let’s take REM, to get around. They got out
  of Atlanta and they were just in southern American and then a couple of years
  later they finally made it up the East Coast and to New York. and then they
  spread out. [Clerks] was that type of feel; it was something that spoke to
  them because it wasn’t a wide, mainstream release.

From all of us at RazorFine and all those View Askew fans worldwide,
Thanks Guys!

Clerks II: The Interview Read More »

Clerks – The Story So Far

Kevin Smith Week continues here on RazorFine.  Today we’ve set aside just for the Clerks.  We’ll have reviews for Clerks II on Friday, but before we get to where we’re going it’s always a good idea to look back where we’ve been.  So let’s look back at the the film that made Kevin Smith a star and the short lived cartoon that hardly anyone saw…

Clerks
Custom Rating

Depending on your view Clerks was either a breath of fresh air, as a new and unique voice was discovered, and heard, for the first time, OR you wondered to yourself, who gave that foul mouthed fat man a camera anyway?  I’m among the former.  Kevin Smith’s low budget flick (the film was made for $27,575, paid for mostly by maxing out credit cards) is just plain fun, and it holds up quite well over ten years later..

“I’m not even supposed to be here today.”

Clerks – The Story Begins

Dante Hicks (Brian O’Halloran) is a lovable loser who works the counter at the Quick Stop.  His extroverted vulgarian best friend Randal (Jeff Anderson) works next door at the video store.  Their lives seems stuck in neutral as Dante dreams of a better life while debating Randal on pop culture issues while dealing with customers, inciteful bubblegum salesmen, and stoners Jay (Jason Mewes) and Silent Bob (Kevin Smith).  During the course of the day Dante talks to his current gilfriend (Marilyn Ghigliotti) about her sexual history while daydreaming of his former girlfriend (Lisa Spoonhauer), takes time off to play hockey with his buds on the roof, and disrupts the funeral of a high school friend. 

This low budget black and white film may not have great cinematic scope, but its heart is in the right place.  It’s look and style help to jump you into this world of luckless losers – one who dreads his life, and one who is quite happy with living day-to-day.

There are plenty of good moments to enjoy.  Some of my favorites include the discussion of Imperial contractors in Return of the Jedi, Dante’s argument with his girlfriend over the magic number 37 – and Randal’s hilarious reaction, and Randal’s unique customer service skills.

For a low budget film with a small cast the chemistry works well, and both O’Halloran and Anderson are able to make these roles their own, while other, more experienced, actors have struggled in Smith’s later films.

Does he go too far?  For some perhaps, but for this group of characters the conversations and situations seem quite natural.  Not for everyone to be sure, as the film jokes about many issues including necrophelia, oral sex, pornography, and under-age smoking.  Though to be fair to Smith he is careful to always paint the extreme view or action as extreme, crazy, and having consequences.

Clerks on TV

The lives of Dante and Randal continue at the Quick Stop in six half-hour animated adventures.  They fight off billionaire Leonardo Leonardo (Alec Baldwin) who tries to put the Quck Stop out of business by opening “The Quicker Stop” across the street, Randal is responsible for “accidentally” poisoning Leonardo Leonardo and causing an outbreak scare.  They get caught in a freezer and remember past adventures, go to court, coach a little league team, get lost in anime, and have to escape from a Temple of Doom.  They also deal with a number of celebrities that show up with their own issues such as Charles Barkley and Gwenyth Paltrow.

Only two of the episodes ever made it to air, but here you can see all of this short lived, and quickly cancelled, odd little slice of history.  It’s strange to see the strong R-rated View Askew Universe be painted into a PG or PG-13 corner.  Example: we got odd changes like Jay and Bob selling fireworks instead of drugs.

Though it takes a little getting used to, the show does have a unique style and voice that was just starting to emerge when it was cancelled.  Perhaps more of a novelty than anything else, but still there are quite a few reasons to check it out including an anime finish to an episode (way before South Park did it), and a great parody episode that shows off the near limitless avenues for these characters to explore.

My favorite parts of each episode are the ending sequences such as “Safety Tips with Jay and Silent Bob,” “Rainy Day Fun with Jay and Silent Bob,” and “Science Sez with Jay and Silent Bob.”  In each the pair try and teach an important lesson to children, while also making sure Charles Barkley (who provides his own voice) is sent packing – sometimes quite violently. 

In many ways these little segments capsulized the appeal of the entire series which was maybe a little too smart or relied too much on in-jokes for the larger audience that ABC wanted.  The extras on the set including commentary for every episode help balance out some of the weaknesses of the show and provide some insight in how hard it is to get, and keep, a show on network television.

It’s nice to see Kevin Smith return to these characters once again in Clerks II.  From the first film and these half-dozen animated episodes these characters have grown, much like the View Askew Universe, into something bigger than themselves.  Smith’s first work, and his need to continue to return to it, show that there are stories about these characters still left untold.  I hope to see more.

Clerks – The Story So Far Read More »

Jersey Girl

It’s no Gigli, thank goodness, it is something much much better. Given just about anything is better than Gigli, except for Battlefield Earth. Ben Affleck has redeemed himself with his female audience. After Gigli and the whole Bennifer fiasco, Jersey Girl is a pleasant cuddly film that many can enjoy. Ben you are forgiven! Kevin Smith steps out of his crazy cult film attire, puts Jay and Silent Bob in a closet, and tries on a more wholesome and grown up approach to movie making. Kevin admits it’s because of his new found experiences of being a father himself that has led him down this road.

Jersey Girl
Custom Rating

Jersey Girl is a film about a man who thinks he has it all and he himself was everything, but learns that he was nothing and having it all can be empty without the right person to share it with. That right person so happens to be new comer 13-year old Raquel Castro, an adorable little girl that captured hearts and tickled funny bones on the big screen. Jersey Girl is still in the independent film genre for writer and director Kevin Smith, but it has a big time commercial film shine to it. Icing on the cake is the adorable Liv Tyler playing the sexually curious and dazzling cute video store clerk that assists with mending a broken man’s heart. Yes, yes, I have not forgotten about Jennifer Lopez, she is in the film; thankfully it wasn’t a long enough role to destroy any high ground that Ben has began to earn.

 

Rumor has it that Ben’s career had hit rock bottom since he began to date Jennifer, part 2 now. Rather or not it was her fault or the fact that so many of us appreciate Ben for his charms and attractiveness and watching a captured man that you want to dream about wasn’t as great knowing he was no longer available. My personal opinion is that Ben hit a slump, the opportunities were there, they just didn’t work out the way they should. Ben should keep with the sweet happy feel good romantic roles and stir away from playing super hero. Unless, he is riding up on a large white steed and saving the damsel in distress, it doesn’t work for him. Jersey Girl, I am sad to say, will be another downer for Ben; it’s cute and adorable and a great deal of the female population will love it, but that minority isn’t the only group that has to like it. It is a happy-go-lucky movie with popcorn and candy oozing out of it, nothing but a mouth full of cavities; so set up your dentist appointment and check it out! Jersey Girl is worth the fillings. Way to go Kevin and Ben!

Jersey Girl Read More »

Leave it to the Catholics to Destroy Existence

  • Title: Dogma
  • IMDb: link

I give huge props to anyone who attempts to do a religious film, much less a religious comedy.  The level of controversy, protests, and roadblocks, has to be at time overwhelming.  Hate mail, death threats, money and distribution issues, and a host of new actors who he hadn’t worked with before and special effects shots which he’d never done – and you know what?  Kevin Smith proves his doubters wrong.  It’s a pretty entertainin’ flick, which underneath the giant poop monster and “bad language” actually has a few insightful things to say about the nature of religion.

Leave it to the Catholics to Destroy Existence Read More »