Comedy

Kinky Boots

  • Title: Kinky Boots
  • IMDb: link

Okay you’ve seen this one before.  This light-hearted English comedy where people learn to accept people and ideas that are thrust into their lives and everyone, despite the troubles they go through during the film, lives happily ever after.  To this much overused mix we add RazorFine favorite Chiwetel Ejiofor in drag and a conservative shoe factory producing shoes for women who are men who dress like women.  The odd mix creates some enjoyable, if sometimes unoriginal, fun.

Kinky Boots Read More »

Thank You for Smoking

  • Title: Thank You for Smoking
  • IMDB: link

“Death is easy; comedy is hard.”

“Satire is fascinating stuff…it’s the only thing that makes any sense.”

Big Tobacco is constantly under attack from all sides.  That’s where Nick Naylor (Aaron Eckhart) comes in.  He’s their chief spokesman who can spin any situation to his advantage making both himself and the Tobacco Lobby look good in the process.  How does he do it?  It’s a gift.

At the same time Nick is trying to help raise his impressionable 12 year-old son Joey (Cameron Bright), giving an interview to an attractive young reporter (Katie Holmes), fighting a Senate Investigating Committee headed by anti-tobacco Senator Ortolan K. Finistirre (William H. Macy) and trying to pay-off the Malboro Man (Sam Elliott) who is dying of cancer and ready to speak against Big Tobacco to the press.

Aaron Eckhart is the heart and soul of this film as everything rests on his performance, and he delivers an Oscar caliber performance.  Not only does he make Nick Naylor compassionate but he actually starts to persuade you with his arguments as well.  With a warmth and charm he actually makes you believe Big Tobacco isn’t really that bad.  Is it?

Thank You for Smoking Read More »

Scary Movie 4

Okay, I went to see the first Scary Movie back in 2000 and I laughed, groaned, and winced my way through.  In the end I had a fine time but didn’t feel the need to see the next two sequels.  In watching the fourth film of the “trilogy,” which hits theaters today, I experienced a very strong deja vu reaction.  The parts that work still work and the parts that don’t…. well, still don’t.  Even with it’s flaws, the film does have just enough to offer for me to recommend it.  What, you ask?  Well…

Scary Movie 4
3 Stars

This year’s edition plays on the same Airplane style type of comedy (enhanced with the addition of Leslie Neilsen in a supporting role) with the body fluid and homosexuality jokes scaled back though we do get the obligatory Brokeback Mountain parody.  The star of this series remains the set designer for the level of detail recaptured in the different spoofs; I just wish the acting and writing was as consistent.

The plot of the film is basically a thin structure that houses the various parodies of the film and loosely links them together.  The main story follows the plot lines of War of the Worlds, The Grudge, and Saw, spliced together with many other films such as The Village, Million Dollar Baby, and humorous and odd real life incidents like Tom Cruise‘s total meltdown on Oprah.

Anna Faris returns as Cindy Cambpell who takes a job as a nurse for an older woman (Cloirs Leachaman)  in a house haunted by the spirit a little boy (Garrett Masuda).  Next door to her lives Tom Ryan (Craig Bierko), a lifetime screwup whose ex-wife drops off his two kids (Conchita Campbell and (Beau Mirchoff) to stay with him.  Tom has just enough time to make his kids hate him more and start a relationship with Cindy before the aliens attack.  The evil tri-pods trap humans into small rooms forcing them play out sadistic games with life and death stakes.

Cindy learns that the secret to defeating the aliens means finding the father of the dead boy (Bill Pullman) and with her friend Brenda (Regina Hall) goes off to the 17th century village where he lives with his blind daughter (Carmen Electra).  Meanwhile Tom tries to take his kids to safety and encounters more aliens and a scary survivalist (Michael Madsen).  Also the President of the United States (Leslie Neilsen), who is more concerned with the outcome of a children’s book than fighting off the aliens, is called on to lead the counter-attack.

My main praise is the same I gave the first film.  The level of detail in creating the sets, costumes, and effects from the various films it parodies is the strongest aspect of the film.  Check out the cellar where Tom and his daughter hide, or the house that’s haunted by the spirit of the young boy, or the deftly recreated village.  Big kudos here for production designer Holger Gross, art director William Heslup, and costume designer Carol Ramsey.  Without their immense contributions the film would be easily forgettable and far less interesting to watch.

As for the writing and acting it’s rather hit and miss.  Anna Faris is fine in this type of role which she’s done in countless movies now and I hope she gets the chance to breakout into something a little more challenging soon.  Neilsen is a good edition and his inclusion actually raises the level of the film a notch or two.  The other actors were cast mainly for their looks and ability to mimic the mannerisms of the people they are parodying.  Bierko comes off best here with a pretty good Cruise impersonation and Garrett Masuda as the ghost child and Michael Madsen as the survivalist were some great casting calls.

I went into the film fully prepared to hate it, but the truth it’s so moronically funny it’s hard not to laugh and enjoy yourself at least a little.  Yeah it’s lowbrow and crude and for every joke that works there’s one that will make you groan, but enough do work to make it entertaining and watchable.  It does a good job in parodying the various films and poking fun at some of the problems with those films as well (especially The Village and War of the Worlds).  It is what it is and, though not for everyone, for what it is it’s not too bad.

Scary Movie 4 Read More »

The Mild

This movie helps you understand the Disney purchase of Pixar.  When Disney is stealing story, characters, plot, settings, and basically everything from Dreamworks… well, you know they’ve hit rock bottom.  The film is almost a carbon copy of last years Madagascar and despite the fact it steals everything but the kitchen sink it still took six writers to come up with this script.  Really?  Six writers?  For this? 

Is it worth seeing?  Did you like Madagascar?  Would you have liked it without Ben Stiller, Chris Rock, David Schwimer and Jada Pinkett Smiith?  If the answer is yes than this summer’s good dumb fun flick for the whole family is just waiting for you.

The Wild
2 & 1/2 Stars

If you missed seeing Madagascar (check out Aaron’s review here) on the big screen here’s you chance!  Wow folks, Disney animation is in such a state of decline that it’s now stealing plot, character, scenes, dialogue, and story from Dreamworks.  Maybe Mickey Mouse needs to get a second job.

A group of animals leave the zoo and travel around New York then make their way on a boat to a beach and into the jungles of “the wild.”  There they are met by a tribe of strange singing and dancing creatures with a wacky ruler who puts one of the group in charge. 

Any of this sound familiar?  Well it should because it’s the exact plot to last year’s Madagascar but somehow it also turns out to be the plot to The Wild with only a few minor differences.  This time there is a lion (Kiefer Sutherland) and a giraffe (Jeneane Garofalo) but the zebra and hippo have been replaced by a squirrel (James Belushi), a snake (Richard Kind), and a koala bear (Eddie Izzard).  And the wacky but cute lemurs who sing and dance are replaced by the wacky but creepy wildebeasts who sing and dance (the leaders played here by William Shatner and Patrick Warburton in roles they could, and seemingly did, do in thier sleep).  The main structure of the story stays the same except this time the group leaves to rescue the lion’s son (Greg Cipes) rather than the zebra.

Along the way there’s some nice music, tons and tons of (rather pointless and monotonous) dialogue, and a few clever jokes.  Kids will probably enjoy the film and it’s the type of nice dumb summer comedy that seems to play well with families.  But, aside from the similarities with the superior Madagascar, which itself is only so-so, there are a few problems.

First off there are some mind-numbing inexcusable missteps and miscues.  One such example: the group of animals escape the New York Zoo and drive around the city in a dump truck.  Aside from how lame that sounds the computer animation people didn’t create a single car (parked or moving) or a single person walking around the city as they drive through the completely empty and spotless streets of New York including Times Square.  Did I fall asleep?  Are they doing an animated version of Vanilla Sky?  Or did they just run out of money in the animation budget?  I would rather except those excuses than the more obvious one that the creators saw this as a meaningless kids film that didn’t need the level of detail and realism you would get in a Powerpuff Girls episode.  There are quite a few such problems in the film though this is one of the most glaring.

The acting is fine but only Izzard’s koala bear is given any interesting dialogue (and you can tell most of his funny bits were all ad-libbed).  Shatner and Walburton are pretty good as the villains (aside from being so far over-the-top they make Bobcat Goldthwait look sedated).  But when the most interesting characters of a movie are villains who still aren’t that compelling you know you’ve run into a disasterous dud of a Disney film (yeah, I like my alliteration).

The animation is the computer style that tries to add a bit of realism with showing you every hair or scail on the animals.  While interesting to look at I prefer the older style of animation than this new look that hasn’t yet been perfected.  And even if it is pretty to look at and does give you a couple chuckles that’s not saying much for a feature length animated film from Disney.  A big miss here for the house that Mickey built.  Hopefully the Pixar deal will breathe some much needed life into what used to be the best animated studio around because all its doing right now is making Dreamworks look much better by comparision.

The Mild Read More »

Ole

Pierce Brosnan and Greg Kinnear give us the odd pairing of the hitman and the salesman in Mexico where margaritas aren’t the only thing that tastes better.  Brosnan kicks some serious ass as the hitman who has lost his edge but not his inappropriate sense of humor.

The Matador
3 & 1/2 Stars

Pierce Brosnan is funny.  It’s been so many years since Remington Steele that I had forgotten how funny he could be.  If The Tailor of Panama was a realistic take on his Bond character The Matador is the comedic take.  Brosnan owns the screen in this nice little gem.

Danny Wright (Greg Kinnear) is a struggling businessman who has traveled to Mexico with his business partner to try and put together a deal to save his livelihood.  In the hotel bar one night he meets Julian Noble (Pierce Brosnan) an interesting but rather uncouth gentleman who buys him a drink.  Aganist his better judgement Danny spends some time with Julian and learns what he does for a living.  Julian is a hitman, though one who is beginning to lose his edge. 

Time passes and Julian has botched another job so badly that his bosses have put a hit out on the hitman.  With nowhere else to go he goes to stay with Danny and his wife Bean (Hope Davis) hoping to guilt Danny into helping to get him out of this mess and remind Danny of the favor he owes.

Brosnan is terrific as the friendless lone gunman who doesn’t really know how to act with people (his comments to Danny in the bar are hysterical!)  Kinnear works well as a straight man to Brosnan’s antics and Davis, who I normally don’t like, is well cast as Danny’s wife.  There are many small characters but the film rests on the odd couple relationship between Danny and Julian who aren’t quite friends but something more than strangers.

The movie skips around a little too much and could use one last edit as the film is slightly uneven in its tone.  I also wasn’t a fan of the large full screen fonts in presenting a new location or story transition.

The Matador is a good comedy that allows Brosnan to go full out and give one hell of a performance.  Though not great, I’d put this at the top of pretty good comedies of the year such as Waiting…, Cassanova, and The Weather Man, it’s definately worth checking out for a very different type of comedy than the usual Hollywood fare.

Ole Read More »