Drama

That’s All?

  • Title: All the King’s Men
  • IMDb: link

All the King's MenIn 1950 All the King’s Men won Best Actor (Broderick Crawford), Best Supporting Actress (Mercedes McCambridge), and Best Picture.  I wish that was the film we were about to discuss, but sadly it is not.  In 2006 Hollywood decided to make an inferior remake.  Sadly, this is the film we will discuss.

Willie Stark (Sean Penn) is chosen by mobster Tiny Duffy (James Gandolfini) to enter the race for Louisiana Governor.  Tiny sees Stark as the wide-eyed innocent do-gooder who will split the vote and keep his man in office.  Once Stark learns of this situation he plunges head on into the campaign and becomes the Governor of Louisiana.

While this is happening, young newspaper man Jack Burden (Jude Law) is covering the story for his paper, and begins to believe that Willie Stark might just be the right man for the job.  Burden sees a fellow dreamer in Willie and thinks, just maybe, Stark might do some good.

Once in office Stark takes on the oil companies and state legislature, tyring to make good his campaign promises of spreading the wealth and creating new jobs, new schools, new roads and bridges, for the less fortunate of the state.  The power brokers however see this man as a menace and fight to hold onto their wealth.

Oddly enough the movie doesn’t have a main character.  The first half of the movie centers mostly around Stark, at times leaving his story to focus on Burden.  In the film’s second half the focus shifts 180, as Stark’s story is moved to the back-burner in favor of Burden’s tale.

There are countess stories that branch off of Burden’s tale which involve his childhood best friend (Mark Ruffalo), who Willie wants to use for publicity, his childhood crush (Kate Winslet), who has her own secrets, his disapproving mother (Kathy Baker), his relationship with Stark and his staff including Stark’s gal Friday (Patricia Clarkson), his relationship with the influential man who helped raise him (Anthony Hopkins), who Stark wants Burden to bring down, and more.

The film feels very much like a large novel shoved into the small frames of a movie reel.  There’s just too much there, and it’s so badly managed that you never really learn about the situations or characters.  Was Willie Stark a good Samaritan that wanted to help out the unfortunate, or was he a crook and thief milking the state for money?  The movie never decides, and, what’s worse, never even presents evidence either way.  All we get is third-hand gossip.

The structure of the film leaves much to be desired.  It opens in an odd flashback sequence that is troubling, and Willie’s initial forray into politic is less than adequately explained (and Tiny’s as a choice for Lt. Governor is never explained).  In too many places the film feels like an unfinished rough-cut instead of a movie being pushed into the Oscar race.

The two men’s stories don’t really have much to do with each other, and the film would have been better served to put one or the other front and center instead of wobbling between the two.  Nor do the flashbacks from Burden’s past, shown over and over again, add to any part of the film.  It’s just a slow plodding exercise that seems to be there to give everyone a chance to act.

Speaking of the acting, it’s darn good.  The film survives based on the performances of these actors – and considering Penn looks like he’s wearing a groundhog on his head for most of the film that’s something to be proud of.

The level of talent here sets expectations and demands certainly more than competence.  Sadly that’s all we get.  The film really, really wants to be an Oscar contender, but there isn’t a single performance, shot, line of dialogue, or piece of score, that is memorable, let alone remarkable.  This film feels very much like a remake and a film based off a novel, but without the author’s perspective.  We get characters, we get stories, but we don’t get a point.  With the cast involved and a director like Steven Zaillian behind the camera I expected more than an underwhelming, two-hour, instantly forgettable film.

That’s All? Read More »

Football for Felons

  • Title: Gridiron Gang
  • IMDb: link

gridiron-gang-posterCamp Kilpatrick is a juvenile detention facility in sunny California, but there’s little sunny on the inside.  The facility is losing the battle against gangs.  Those sent here are overwhelmingly likely, after their release, to end up either dead on the street or spending their lives in prison.

Sean Porter (The Rock) and Malcolm Moore (Xzibit) are two counselors fighting to find a way to save more of these kids.  Porter believes creating a football program could make a difference.  As you can imagine such a program isn’t popular with his bosses (Leon Rippy, Kevin Dunn) or with the local high school coaches who are the only avaiable competition, but Porter is determined and the fighting Mustangs are born.

Those chosen for the team include gangbanger and killer Willie Weathers (Jade Yorker) whose cousin (Michael J. Pagan) was killed by a rival gang, white trash Kenny Bates (Trever O’Brien), super-sized lifetime screw-up Junior Palaita (Setu Taase), and mouthy thief Bug Wendal (Brandon Smith).

One of the strengths of the film is despite giving these kids the chance to shine and look good it never forgets that they are criminals.  The slate isn’t immediately wiped clean, but this is a first step to a better life.

The football moments of the film are well staged and shot, looking a little too perfect for high school games at times, but that’s just the nitpicker in me.  As impressive as those scenes are the real moments of the film are the quiet ones where these characters actually grow and change over the course of the film.  A movie with The Rock that includes character development?  Who would of thought!

There are a few subplots sprinkled through the film; some work better than others.  There’s Willie’s girlfriend (Jurnee Smollett) who loves him but hates his violent side and whose father (Dan Martin) wants her to stay away from gangbangers.  There’s Kenny’s relationship with his mother (Mary Mara) who has given up on him.  There’s the poor health of Porter’s mother (L. Scott Campbell).  And there’s the cheerleader program of a girls juvenlie facility (which is just too Hollywood “cute” for me).  None of these subplots are strong enough to carry the film, but the add a little flavor to the different characters and, perhaps most importantly, don’t drag the film down.

A cautionary note for parents.  Despite the film’s marketing as a feel good family friendly film, there are some elements including gang violence that would be inappropriate for younger children.  The film deserves its PG-13 rating.

There’s plenty to see here and not only enjoy but discuss with teenagers.  The film takes a serious look at the damage and effect that gangs have on our youth.  Wrapped up in a cute football package, the film is surprisingly well informed and informative, and so we get more than we expected.

Football for Felons Read More »

Looking for Kitty

  • Title: Looking for Kitty
  • IMDb: link

After his wife leaves him without explanation, a high school baseball coach from upstate New York makes his way into the city.

Looking for KittyUnable to find her on his own Abe Fiannico (David Krumhotlz) hires private detective Jack Stanton (Edward Burns).  Together the two comb the city for Abe’s wife Kitty (Avi Meyers).  The only clue the pair have is a newspaper photograph of Kitty with rock star Ron Stewart (Max Baker).

As the two search we learn Jack is also suffering from the loss of his own wife; unable to do anything about his own situation, and despite his gruff stand-offish nature, Jack begins to think of Abe as a friend and becomes emotionally involved with the case.

Looking For Kitty is what you want a small independent film to be.  It’s well written with a small but effective cast.  Krumholtz and Burns carry 85% of the film, but there are a couple of nice supporting performances to mention.

Connie Britton works well in the small role as Jack’s new mysterious neighbor.  The awkwardness of the two around each other comes off as so realistic you almost forget you are watching a film.

And let us not forget the two comedic flashes of the film.  Kevin Kash finds just the right balance of neediness and humor in the role of Jack’s super, and Chris Parnell as the greasy, self-important, rock manager who insists everyone call him “Cougar,” despite the fact he is as un-cat-like as any man ever born.

There are some flaws here.  The two stories never completely merge and the epilogue of the film seems a little redundant.  There also Rachel Dratch as a obnoxious boozehound, who seems very close to a crazy drunk person you would meet in a real hotel bar, but her recurring role in the film never amounts to much and started to grate on my nerves.

For fans of Burns, the director or actor, I think you will enjoy yourselves.  It’s not a great film, but it is a very good one.  It won’t wow you, but if you sit back and relax you’ll find quite an enjoyable little film.  Even with the problems I have with the film it’s an easy one to recommend.  Looking for Kitty is currently showing in select cities; check you local listings to see if it’s playing near you.

Looking for Kitty Read More »

Wilting Flower

  • Title: The Black Dahlia
  • IMDb: link

black-dahlia-posterTwo cops, Bucky Bleichert (Josh Hartnett) and Lee Blanchard (Aaron Eckhart), both former boxers, find themselves thrown together, first in the ring, and later on the street trying to solve the mysterious death of a young women who wanted nothing more than to be a Hollywood star.  The film centers around the relationship of the two cops and Lee’s girl, Kay (Scarlett Johansson).

One of the films plot threads involves the death of Elizabeth Short (Mira Kirshner) who the papers tab “The Black Dahlia.”  But that’s only one of several mysteries.  There’s the spoiled rich girl with secrets (Hilary Swank) and her dysfunctional family, the hidden reason behind Lee’s obsession with the case, a recent parolee (Richard Brake) who has it in for Lee and frightens Kay to death, the case of a child rapist and killer, and a dirty movie staring young Miss Short and another woman (Jemima Rooper).

There are also subplots including Bleichert’s throwing a boxing match for his adle-minded father (James Otis), office politics in the police station, and the love triangle between the three leads.

Wilting Flower Read More »

Far Too Simple Slight of Hand

  • Title: The Illusionist
  • IMDb: link

the-illusionist-posterHow critically do you watch films?  I ask this because a film like The Illusionist presupposes its audience to watch for entertainment and not pay too close attention to the man behind the curtain.  I dislike movies that take the audience’s intelligence and attention for granted.  This film assumes you are relatively dumb and unobservant.  If you, like me, watch a film, especially a suspense film, with a careful eye then you will no doubt be disappointed.  The Illusionist is all too willing, and eager, to give away its secrets.

The movie begins in a way that infuriates me.  It begins at the end, with the illusionist Eisenheim (Edward Norton) being arrested for his performances by Chief Inspector Uhl (Paul Giamatti).  The film then takes place in a long flashback that explains the events leading up to this moment.  Why give away this much information in the first three minutes of the film?  Well since the film seems so eager to give away its secrets, I guess it doesn’t really matter.

From this point on the film profiles Eisenheim’s life, career as a magician, the events leading to his arrival in Vienna, and his arrest.  At times the film forgets its taking place in flashbacks as the narration goes away and we are presented with intimate details and conversations the narrator – Inspector Uhl, not Eisenheim, could not possibly have known.

On arriving in Vienna, Eisenheim discovers a childhood love, the duchess Sophie (Jessica Beil).  Despite her impending marriage to the Crown Prince Leopold (Rufus Sewell), the two renew acquaintances and begin their love anew.

While in town Eisenheim also begins performing his illusions on stage.  At first they are slight of hand and magical tricks which become increasingly elaborate.  At one point in the film Eisenheim begins to converse with near perfect (too perfect for a magician today, let alone during this time period) ghostly images of the recently departed.  Eisenheim’s role in conjuring them is to sit in a chair on stage with his arm extended and act as constipated as possible.

Leopold is not pleased with Eisenheim’s affections for his betrothed or his fraudulent illusions.  He demands that Inspector Uhl prove him a fraud and close him down.  From that point all the characters change from smart, clever, and exceptionally observant to stupid, blind and bumbling, and back again, as dictated by the overly elaborate plot.  As you watch pay attention to each scene and you’ll notice paradoxes will occur no matter how the film decides to end (though the end is easy to guess).

The only way for such a plot to work is for characters to constantly be switching between being extremely clever and irrevocably stupid.  They have to be smart enough to make actions to further the plot and make discoveries, but yet be dumb enough to miss the obvious that is presented to them on a silver platter.

What starts out as a fairy tale about a beautiful princess, an evil prince, a magician and true love, quickly dissolves into melodrama and rather un-twistful twists.  The film drops large clunking plot points like anvils throughout the film instead of allowing the audience members to make an opinion on whether they believe Eisenheim illusions to magical or elaborate tricks.  It even goes so far to tack on an epilogue that explains everything for those who weren’t paying attention (think of the ending of Wild Things – there’s a great film to emulate!).

And then there’s the curse of Jessica Beil.  Now I’m not in anyway saying she’s a paticularly bad actress, in fact I think she’s been fine in most films I’ve seen her in.  Though I would suggest she stay away from period roles like this one in the future.  However she has a knack for finding the worst bungled films to star in (Blade Trinity, Stealth, Summer Catch, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Rules of Attraction, and Elizabethtown).  Her career (one that Ed Wood would be envious of!) is such a war zone that any film she’s cast in has an above average chance to set the theater on fire when it inevitably crashes and burns.  You don’t have to accept every script that comes your way, Ms. Beil.

Would you have enjoyed The Sixth Sense if you knew 25 minutes in that Bruce Willis was a ghost?  Say what you want about M. Night Shyamalan, but he does understand how to create a good twist (whether or not the film makes sense afterward is another story).  This film makes The Village look like Vertigo.  It relies so heavily on the premise of being able to fool you, but at the same time it’s so willing to give away every secret with clunky clues that you know what’s going to happen before the writers do.  There’s foreshadowing and then there’s yelling “Rosebud’s a sled!” twenty minutes into Citizen Kane.  This movie seems to think the second is the better form of entertainment.  And so, sadly, the curse of Jessica Biel continues.

Far Too Simple Slight of Hand Read More »